all the Russian bots in this thread sweating over “act of war” 
-
-
-
People who don’t want WWW III are all Russian bots?
-
You've evaded her question. I think I'm pretty certain I am not a bot, so I'll re-ask it for her: are you not afraid of World War III?
-
Is that the only possible response? Is attacking our own institutions a more effective deterrent?
-
Well, what response do you have in mind against what you call an act of war? It seems to me that such rhetoric has a rather inevitable conclusion. I am happy to be corrected, however.
-
Is armed combat the only response? Is attacking our own institutions a better deterrent? Because that is what our commander-in chief is doing.
-
Institutions that have lied to go to war? How many more countries do you want to invade and destroy?
- 4 mer svar
Ny konversation -
-
-
The characterization “act of war” would seem to imply that a retaliatory act of war should be taken in return. Do you agree? If so, what “act of war” do you suggest should be taken against Russia?
-
NeoCons want war w Russia. Russia-gate gins up public support. Everything NeoCons do is geared to toppling Putin: Coup in Ukraine => chaos on RU border, more THAAD in the Asia-Pacific undermines MAD, etc. NeoCons think they can survive a 1st strikehttps://consortiumnews.com/2017/03/10/dreams-of-winning-nuclear-war-on-russia/ …
- 1 mer svar
Ny konversation -
-
-
Is anyone who is talking like this prepared to write a letter to the parents of an 18-year old infantryman who is killed in a battle that was triggered by some tweets and Facebook posts?
@mtracey@adamjohnsonNYC -
Sending 18-year-olds off into battle is the inescapable logical conclusion of this rhetoric, but the pundits never acknowledge it.
- 1 mer svar
Ny konversation -
-
-
How many people do you want us to kill because Russia posting some Hillary/Satan memes? This was not an act of war. Calling this an act of war, which would require a war like response is absurd. You people won't be satisfied until blood is shed defending Hillary's loss.
-
Installing illegitimate government that deprives millions of food, health care, heating in the winter, engendering hate. Supporting Assault weapons on our streets contributing to mass murders. Sowing discord.Lowering academic standards.overturning environmental protections?
-
Sadly, all of those things are standard Republican policy and not a result of Russia. You're trying to blame Russia because Americans elected a Republican moron.
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
What kind of retaliation would you like to see? Are your children signed up to fight?pic.twitter.com/GKoEGcIzoj
-
How about implementing the Russian sanctions ? How about keeping the Magnitsky act in place ? How about Trump telling Putin to stop it instead of attacking the FBI and Mueller ?
-
Those sanctions will hurt Europe too. You like your frack water? US is exporting NG to Poland to squeeze Russia out of the European market. Like coal mining? Coal rich Ukraine is no buying expensive coal from the US.
-
Those sanctions hurt innocent people everywhere. We should ask the people in the hundred nations whose elections we have interfered to let us know what better punishment we deserve...
-
Sanctions are nothing but an act of war
-
And what's even funnier, the US violates their own sanctions on Russia, go figure..https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/26/russia-gas-sanctions-american-homes-312866 …
-
Those supporting the sanctions would rather see people unable to afford NG freezing to support their own greed...https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/tanker-carrying-liquefied-natural-gas-from-russias-arctic-arrives-in-boston/2018/01/28/08d3894c-0497-11e8-8777-2a059f168dd2_story.html?utm_term=.98546ca67f0c …
- 2 mer svar
Ny konversation -
Hämtningen verkar ta ett tag
Twitter kan vara överbelastat eller ha tillfälliga problem. Försök igen eller besök Twitter Status om du vill ha mer information.