Even here, if the debate is about hating AWS because they don't contribute to OSS as well as others, you are doing it wrong. It should be about getting them to contribute more to OSS. Let us avoid this debate from becoming shouting match between fans vs hatershttps://twitter.com/krishnan/status/1083413451844640769 …
-
-
Replying to @krishnan
@jzemlin of@linuxfoundation last year to me: "To get the value, it's not just consumed, it is to share back and that there's not some moral obligation, although I would argue that that's also important. There's an actual incredibly large business benefit to that as well."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Exactly my point. The leverage in the community helps the customers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
As
@jzemlin says, there is arguably a moral dimension, but if your strategy is to appeal to Jeff Bezos' altruistic side, you've probably lost that battle.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
OSS is never altruism for me. My arguments are purely from the long term sustainability where both large and small vendors compete to monetize. Any market monopoly through elbowing will lead to government regulating later and I don't prefer that
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.