Based on the epistemologic standards of scientific inference. Not based on cosmic proof of a negative. Have we ever PROVED that swamp miasmas don't cause malaria?
-
-
Replying to @TakeThatCDC @BBBuzzd and
I don’t think they should claim something they have little proof for. It’s a broad statement to say “vaccines do not cause autism” when the only studies focus primarily on MMR & thimerosal aside from one on antigens & one with dtap, concluded as no proof that it doesn’t.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alumilynn @TakeThatCDC and
Again, you like Del and RFK Jr. seemed to miss the subgroup analysis in Figure 3 of the Hviid study.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @crabb_vicki @TakeThatCDC and
That’s not completely unvaccinated like you said below; that’s “unvaccinated without MMR”. If you follow the chart, those that did NOT receive dtap in the 3 groups, but still had MMR, had the least autism, & those that received ALL dtaps with the MMR, had the most.pic.twitter.com/bvvGjsowfe
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alumilynn @TakeThatCDC and
Who do you think the comparison groups are?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @crabb_vicki @TakeThatCDC and
The only one that’s completely unvaccinated, is this first group; and as you can see, the difference is so little it’s nearly irrelevant.pic.twitter.com/Nm5diAqo4b
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alumilynn @TakeThatCDC and
1. Don't make the claim again that the Hviid study does not examine a completely unvaccinated group. 2. Exactly, if the exposure is not related to the outcome, the HRs (ORs,RRs) would not be different and the confidence interval will contain 1. No evidence of increased risk.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @crabb_vicki @TakeThatCDC and
Did you see the difference?..You are making a claim there is a completely unvaxxed group. We don’t “know that” for sure. Speculation on the group I boxed in red is the only closest unvaxxed group in that study and autism rates were very little in difference. 64 to 71.pic.twitter.com/lYXQluHtxT
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alumilynn @crabb_vicki and
There were 4,279 completely unvaxxed - see SS. You can't directly compare 64 to 71 because the denominators are different. The numbers are for only MMR 71/6,482 and no vaccines at all 64/4,729 making the proportion of unvaxxed with ASD insignificantly > than MMR only with ASD.pic.twitter.com/HdG6kLe3mq
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @krebiozen @alumilynn and
I guess we can start claiming that NOT vaccinating with MMR INCREASES autism rates. That would be what RFK and BIgtree would do. But we won’t do that, because it’s not proof of that. However, it does show something important!
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
Did you see Physicians for Informed Consent's idiotic critique of Hviid? It's hilarious. https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/a-review-of-hviid-et-al-s-2019-mmr-autism-study/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.