Maybe anywhere that isn't America does a public platform have a right to do that but not in America.
-
-
Replying to @DanteMaxwell89 @TeamYouTube and
They 100% without any hesitation have the right to enforce the terms and conditions they have. You're not even making an argument. I can't even think of an example of a platform that doesn't have its own rules for use.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kpweaver27 @DanteMaxwell89 and
Perhaps Robbie doesn’t understand the difference between the internet, a public entity, and YouTube, a platform owned by a limited liability company that is a subsidiary of Google.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bookdragon63 @kpweaver27 and
You're not understand me. A real world U.S. public platform can't shut down free speech. The government is just now catching up and will if social media keeps it up make the decide to either be a public platform or something else entirely.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DanteMaxwell89 @bookdragon63 and
The main reason this will happen is due to the importance this has in the U.S., it's politics, and also it's elections. More and more are conservatives silence each day because someone doesn't like their viewpoints on something already claiming to be a public platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanteMaxwell89 @bookdragon63 and
Conservatives just bitch ten times louder about it to make people think someone is doing something. They demonitized Crowder. So what, almost all political pages are demonitized. By not removing him, they're protecting conservatives. Drop the martyr act.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kpweaver27 @bookdragon63 and
They also make it harder for videos to show up even to those subscribed andthat have the bell clicked. It isn't just with him and the more people want to complain about him yes they will take down his channel. It has already happened to plenty of others.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanteMaxwell89 @kpweaver27 and
It isn't an imagined slight and it is something that is getting to where it will be looked into and more so if not handled properly yes the government will look into it the evidence is already ther now that politicians legally can't block anyone their own accounts.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanteMaxwell89 @bookdragon63 and
Politicians can't block people because of public record law that only applies to elected officials. Has zero to do with this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kpweaver27 @bookdragon63 and
We'll have to see the closer it gets. The evidence is there that it can happen but given time it may or may not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, this isn't a debate. The law that requires elected officials to preserve communications has absolutely nothing to do with this. Full stop.
-
-
-
Replying to @bookdragon63 @DanteMaxwell89 and
I have a baby girl, I'm always tired :)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
