I think the trouble is... At what point do you call something fascist? When it's obvious to every person in America, is it too late?
-
-
Replying to @billyjoecain @JordanChariton and
when total centralized authoritarianism propped up by one party rule and a violent police state arises, i'd say
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @billyjoecain @JordanChariton and
well that doesn't don't mean fight forces pulling us in that direction, but that's not the same thing and this doesn't really apply
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KPhed @JordanChariton and
The question is... Which of the many definitions of fascism do you follow? There are plenty.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billyjoecain @KPhed and
This seems to be a bit more grey... And right after WWII. http://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @billyjoecain @KPhed and
I think I go with Orwell's definition. In other words, it's hard to define.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @billyjoecain @JordanChariton and
yes, it's hard to define but Jordan's use of the term isn't accurate and certainly isn't well thought out. inflammatory for the sake of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KPhed @billyjoecain and
which undercuts criticism of a serious issue, which is why this bothers me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KPhed @JordanChariton and
What do you think of Orwell's commentary? He basically says that the word is so hard to define, you're wasting your time.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
but i don't think it's that hard to define. most political ideologies have a level of ambiguity depending on the scholar.
-
-
Replying to @KPhed @JordanChariton and
That's part of the problem. It IS hard to define.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.