Dr. Paige Harden

@kph3k

professor interested in genetics and social inequality. “Fierce debater.” “Not an economist.” “Mildly normcore.”

Austin, Texas
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2008.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @kph3k

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @kph3k

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    25. ožu 2019.

    from genetic essentialism --> conceptualizing genes as luck from genetic determinism --> identifying growth potential from scientific racism --> prioritizing diversity My full talk on "A World with Equity in Educational Success" (+Q&A)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 10 sati
    Poništi
  3. 2. velj

    2- Other methods for estimating heritability don’t rely on the EEA, or on twins at all, but on random variation in the extent of genomic sharing between siblings. And guess what! Heritability doesn’t go away!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    (Side note: started this study bc he was out to prove the EEA wrong. Luckily for us, he’s one of those people who .... ahem.... actually changes his mind in response to new information)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    1- Twins are regularly misclassified by their parents & others, which creates an opportunity to test whether their phenotypic similarity tracks their actual genetic relatedness or their social identity as MZ or DZ. It’s the former (by )

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 2. velj

    I can think of few things less “lively” than rehashing a conversation about the EEA, especially since twin studies are no longer the major workhorses of psychiatric genetics. BUT lest other people be confused that this is still actually a contentious issue....

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 2. velj

    “What did genes do to deserve their sinister, juggernaut-like reputation? ... Why are genes thought to be so much more fixed and inescapable in their effects than television, nuns, or books?” (Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype)

    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    Scientists who report genetic associations with intelligence are perceived as having less egalitarian values -- an empirical study that summarizes the gist of my replies/DMs in the past 2 days

    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    Academic pubs, if you want to dive into the empirical side of things: Last but not least .... I have a review / commentary on "Human Diversity" that I'd like to get out there, in case you know an editor who'd be interested!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 30. sij

    5. Is DNA a "fortune-teller"? Is DNA all that matters? 6. Does genetic research mean that parenting doesn't matter? (video) 7. Why should progressives embrace genetic research on education? (continued)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 30. sij

    3. Is there any reason to expect that race differences in IQ are "genetic"? 4. Why do we think of genetic research on some things as inherently right-wing? (continued)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    Well, this struck a chord. To new followers: here are some other things I've written about genetics, Murray, HBD, social justice, etc. 1. Is intelligence a biological construct? 2. What good are polygenic scores? (continued)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 29. sij

    Reminder: opposing racism doesn’t require you to pretend that there’s no such thing as human ability, that IQ tests have no validity, or that genes don’t matter for human individual differences. Repeating easily-disprovable talking points helps no one.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Nothing says "Charles Murray wrote an op-ed about genetics in the Wall Street Journal" like the direction of that double helix lololol

    Poništi
  15. 23. sij

    Obviously people on here need to learn how to formulate a strong opinion. Come on folks, tell me how you realllllllly feel

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 23. sij

    Can I cite Twitter DMs?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 23. sij

    Update: this paper is basically turning into a rant against psychology’s love for the idea of GxE

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 23. sij

    Pretty much all of mid-career development is the painful process of figuring out which balls are plastic and which are glass:

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij
    Poništi
  20. 22. sij

    New research w/ Texas Twin Project brain imaging data: Resting state connectivity "fingerprints" can identify who is someone's MZ twin. Classification accuracy for MZs > DZs, but < an individual with themself. Role for genetics but also individuality.

    Poništi
  21. 21. sij

    Reminds me, loosely, of this great piece by : "But there is something else that all of us in the media could do: Instead of asking the objects of bias to do the work of identifying and describing it, we could ask its perpetrators."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·