And hey, I know THOUSANDS of underemployed adjuncts with the education, writing skills, and perspective to contribute SO MUCH MORE. Give them cushy columns in perpetuity.
Näytä tämä ketju
No one should ever publish Andrew Sullivan, David Brooks, Matt Taibbi, Matt Ygesias, Steven Pinker, or Niall Ferguson ever again. Not to "cancel" them but because they have nothing of value to add and never have. They produce vapid, superficial, baseless clickbait.
-
-
-
Clarifications are in order for those who read thru a filter of the worst fears & prejudices of their own imagination instead of the simple words in front of them. Not suggesting anyone be put in jail or be censored. Just suggesting editors make some more interesting choices. JFC
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Yeah, baby!
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Add Tom "just 6 more months" Friedman to the list.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I would add Charles Murray and Bill Kristol to that list.pic.twitter.com/faLCD01TXJ
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Nah, the reason not to publish them is because they promote evil, and especially war. That would be the reason.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
David "oops I embarrassed my friend by inviting them for lunch to a fancy Italian deli but once I sensitively perceived their embarrassment we high tailed it outta there and went slumming for Mexican food" Brooks
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I personally have learned so much by reading an listening to
@mattyglesias ... I don’t think he belongs on this list, even if he is full of “hot takes” -
I appreciate him too. But I have also gotten something out most of the writers mentioned here.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.