Eric Mill

@konklone

This year is going to be different. Proud alum of in the Senate, , and . he/him.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2007.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @konklone

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @konklone

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    15. sij

    I've so loved my 11 years here in DC, working in the non-profit and government world. But this year, I'm changing it up in the private sector: I'll be the lead product manager for Chrome Security. It's a terrific team whose work I've long admired, and I'm excited to jump in!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 6 sati

    My own takeaway from this is that the secretive instincts of political parties/vendors are their own worst enemy. Everyone's talking about "the app". Everything from the vendor to the *name of the app* is all up for rampant paranoid speculation, because nothing was transparent.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 6 sati

    I agree with this whole thread. Most important: * Caucuses aren't a secret ballot. Everyone's "vote" is visible. * "The app" wasn't used for votes; just reporting of precinct results. * Electronic precinct reporting is super common, to meet public demand for real-time results.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. prije 13 sati

    At a panel at this weekend, from the Colorado SoS said some states will soon roll out vulnerability disclosure policies for their election systems - making it easier (and safer!) for the public to report security issues. Outstanding:

    State and local officials also appear to be beginning to view ethical hackers, who discover vulnerabilities and help fix them, as allies in their fight to protect elections. Trevor Timmons, CIO of the Colorado secretary of state’s office, said that a handful of states are preparing to adopt vulnerability disclosure policies (VDPs) to work with researchers to fix bugs in IT systems that support the electoral process.
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 19 sati
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 21 sat

    The PACER-paywall case goes to court this morning. And that's still not enough:

    Poništi
  7. 29. sij

    To be clear, I definitely don't want Facebook to store some indefinite browser history on me, down to the URLs. But I shouldn't be confronted with a company name with no obvious connection to a website I visited or an app I installed. A first-party site or app should be named.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 29. sij

    I don't believe that that's all Facebook has from AT&T, because that's not enough to help anyone target ads or personalize content. If this was a serious transparency effort, it would tell me what content AT&T saw me viewing.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 29. sij

    I went and downloaded the bulk HTML and JSON versions of my Off-Facebook Activity report. It told me nothing about how or where AT&T saw me and reported me to Facebook. For one interaction, the ID is 128900881029137, the type is VIEW_CONTENT, and a timestamp. That's it.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 29. sij

    Hah, no-- ....er, actually, yes, could you do that please?

    Poništi
  11. 28. sij

    But also! 4) What does "disconnect" mean? Facebook is clear you're not deleting the data, just disconnecting it, but does that mean the crosswalk/IDs are deleted? Could it be reconnected? 5) Why is any of this legal without my consent?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 28. sij

    Summary of this thread: 1) Big list of sources, but unclear how data came from them. Very non-obvious for some. 2) Seeing what actual data each source contributed confronts you with the full FB mass download interface. 3) Disconnecting future off-Facebook data is way too hard.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 28. sij

    I certainly get that Facebook is dealing with complicated data, and transparency is a necessary first step for us to all get out of this mess. But this doesn't come across as being designed to actually empower people to understand or remove themselves from surveillance. (5/5)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 28. sij

    The app lets you clear your history right up front, but if you want to disconnect future data, you have to tap 4 more times across multiple screens. Tap "More options", "Manage Future Activity", then "Manage Future Activity" again - then you can disable it. The journey: (4/5)

    The start of Facebook's Off-Facebook Activity screen.
    After tapping "More Options".
    After tapping "Manage Future Activity".
    After tapping "Manage Future Activity" again.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 28. sij

    Every data source I've looked at says it came from "Facebook's business tools", which tells me nothing. Tapping on "2 interactions" is also useless. The download button brings you to the generic screen to download *ALL* your data. No way to focus on off-Facebook activity. (3/5)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 28. sij

    Most of it is websites. But there are also native apps in there, like LinkedIn and a game. More confusingly, there are sources I don't recognize, like AT&T. I don't have any apps from them, and I am not an AT&T customer. So why is this in there? (2/5)

    A description of the number of "interactions" AT&T has about me, in Facebook's Off-Facebook Activity tracker.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 28. sij

    Happy "Off-Facebook Activity" Day to you and yours! Facebook now lets you see the data third parties send to them about you, that FB connects to your account. Turns out it's a lot of data! And that the app has many problems! Here's my data, from over 500 sources: (1/5)

    My Facebook Off-Activity report.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 28. sij

    <3 you CISA, this was almost good, but "change your passwords" is terrible advice. Besides being an infeasible PITA, it's well known that frequent rotation makes passwords weaker. This could have said "set up a password manager" instead, and would have done a lot more good!

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    My interview along with on with . Local governments are not using .gov domain names which creates opportunity for election suppression. Citizens must ensure voting instructions and information is from a legitimate source.

    Poništi
  20. 23. sij

    In an era of Too Many Newsletters, 's low volume Prime Factors shines as a beacon of light in my inbox.

    Three US presidents have been impeached. There are three other countries that have experienced a prime number of impeachments of heads of state: South Korea, Indonesia and Brazil.

Until next prime,
Rachel
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    See, when I did this, it was called anorexia and I had to see a therapist.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·