Okay, if this is the game now, let's play. This nonsense works both ways. Please explain why it doesn't harm the broader @YouTube community when Samantha Bee calls Ivanka Trump a "feckless c***," when Colbert calls Trump a "c*** holster" for Vladimir Putin.https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1136341801109843968 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @benshapiro @YouTube
See, this is why I would never put my entire career at the mercy of
@TeamYouTube like many youtubers do. It’s because their policies don’t really mean anything. If they don’t like you, they’ll demonitize you and legally there’s nothing you can do about it.19 replies 96 retweets 803 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Best and most valid response on this entire thread
2 replies 4 retweets 99 likes -
Replying to @SalTroutman @RobBowlinThe3rd and
No. Big corporations want big government because they have enough money to handle regulation. It crushes their competition.
1 reply 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @kmbshrader @RobBowlinThe3rd and
Invalid point - you can’t choose when/where to apply regulations based on your feelings. Both examples are a form of “discrimination”. I don’t agree with either, btw. I believe businesses have the right to deny service, and the market would eventually sort it out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
They have enough money to handle regulations, lawsuits, etc. where competitors do not. Also, let's not turn a blind eye to the hand holding between those making regulations and the companies. The companies carry their messages free of charge, stifle others and welcome regulation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.