Kate Klonick

@Klonick

Asst. Prof. • PhD/JD • Fellow • Studying internet free speech, private governance, virality & shaming; cog. psychology, AI & algorithms

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Klonick

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Klonick

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    16. sij 2019.

    Me, starting Internet Law class w/a joke: Guys, the last time this course was taught here the cutting edge case was Napster! [blank stares] Me, horrified: Wait. DO YOU KNOW WHAT NAPSTER IS? [sheepish shaking of heads] Me: I'M ONLY 34 I CAN'T ALREADY BE THAT PROFESSOR

    Poništi
  2. prije 13 sati

    This is the celebration of femininity I come to the Super Bowl for.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Great thread and you should read it, not least because it makes the tennis analogy I gave in my recent piece on Facebook's Oversight Board () seem _very_ deep.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    💻 Join Jonathan as a Senior Research Coordinator to sharpen and focus a research agenda and make valuable contributions in the field of cyberlaw and beyond.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 1. velj

    If this video from China of the government USING DRONES TO SPY ON & YELL AT THEIR CITIZENS doesn't make you realize that autocratic governments' co-optation of tech is *THE* problem we should be talking about, I really don't know what will.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    We had a great discussion about ‘s Between Truth and Power today with sessions on authority and legitimacy, the lens of legal and professional culture, and alternative futures

    , , i još njih 6
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Again, the 'slaughterbots' in this video are semi-AWS - their targets were selected by human beings. THEY WOULDN'T BE PROHIBITED BY A BAN ON FULLY AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS. Maybe we should focus on regulating the use of semi-AWS instead of misleading scaremongering.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Happy to have contributed in a small part of this reporting on . Any viral story allows for capturing attention through keyword squatting. Scams scale just like all other things online.

    Poništi
  10. 31. sij

    Reporter to me a week ago: “TikTok says it wants to ban political speech across the platform because it’s just supposed to be fun content.” Me: “yeahhhhhhh that’s not a thing.”

    Poništi
  11. 31. sij

    Everyone is in for a real treat when the latest Arbiters of Truth comes out because and I got to interview with his fancy podcast set up and it was AWESOME

    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    My colleagues are doing such cool things!!

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    It was a high honor to have this conversation, with 1,000 friends plus a polar bear, walruses, & the huge blue whale watching. Thank you, Justice Kagan, , & President Hank Greenberg.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This looks like a barn burner! I’m in.

    Poništi
  15. 31. sij

    This is so kind and also can I just say IS THE BEST, & pushes me on my takes & makes them better & I’m so happy for the wisdom and camaraderie.

    Poništi
  16. 31. sij
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    Also, I know many have pushed back on it, but this is a powerful example of the idea of "clickbait defamation" that raises. Headlines, memes, pictures are stand alone objects. Even reading that entire CNBC article you wouldn't *really* be clear about what the story was.

    Poništi
  19. 29. sij

    (5) Consider all of the above when you're talking about disinformation and misinformation and who/how we hold people, news orgs and companies accountable for it. 7/7

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 29. sij

    (3) Imagine if this was happening 12 hours before the caucuses or New Hampshire. Or the general. Imagine the harm to Warren. (4) Mistakes happen. Misunderstandings happen. The problem is the harms go farther, live longer, and have more impact than ever before. 6/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 29. sij

    (1) CNBC isn't RT. It isn't Breitbart. It isn't MotherJones. It's relatively mainstream. There was no real agenda here. (2)That maybe made its error even more dangerous because people were most trusting of the headline. 5/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·