Is more than .26% of the country non-binary? Because that's 6/2273.
-
-
-
That’d be almost one million people. Almost certainly not.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You think that's bad? I recently learned that monasteries in medieval Europe didn't publish anything written by an American EVER. Bigots.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is
@VIDA_lit erasing any possible non-binary writers who either don’t know they’re non-binary yet, or were have been too afraid to come out as such heretofore? -
Don't be ridiculous. Then we would have to know the numbers for those who have come out, but are afraid to go back in. Down with all archism! Onwards to the happy hunting ground! Destruction of all existing dominance structures!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
according to stats I can find "non-binary" makes about about 0.4% of the population. Harpers has about 0.26% non-binary authors. That doesn't seem like a scandal.
-
Could you stop offending me by applying binary logic to a non-binary topic? No, I'm not non-binary myself, or rather, I don't know, I don't think that this is a binary choice I have to make. Don't you agree? Please avoid "Yes" and "No" in your answer, it would offend me. Or not?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
When all is said and done, we are going to need to start looking and the most marginalised and silenced people of all. I demand to know how many non-ternary people they have published.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Statistically the confidence interval of how many writers would randomly be non-binary is 3-14.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.