@kingsthings It could open up an entirely new can of worms. Or many cans.
I disagree with the Hobby Lobby case. Employees have to subject themselves to the beliefs of a CEO? Doesn't seem fair.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kingsthings why shouldn't the employer be able to determine what they want to cover as benefits? Isn't that the point of Benefits. -
@mochasparklez@kingsthings Because a conservative employer (pro plan b or whatever else) has no business knowing where insurance $$ goes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@kingsthings were talking about a drug that has no medicinal benefits. It shouldn't be questioned if an employer doesn't want to cover it -
@mochasparklez you're entirely wrong if you think the pill has no medicinal benefits. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@kingsthings good point. But should a CEO have to support ($) medical treatments he doesn't ethically or religiously believe in?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kingsthings Mr. King, aren't ALL employees of all companies subject to the CEO's dictating rules/benefits, isn't that the perk of being CEOThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kingsthings I did not realize a for profit company could have religious beliefs and its employees had to abide to them strange decisionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kingsthings That's putting it mildly. It is disgusting!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.