For Palo Alto residents. It's shitty but I can see the logic there.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m fairly sure the appropriate response to this is a massive picnic of “non-residents.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Palo Alto is apparently a large country club
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Public” pools in Piedmont do this as well. If we don’t call it segregation nobody can say we’re racist!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What, do they want you to carry a copy of your light bill with you to prove you live there? Stupid policy.pic.twitter.com/EoYViejW98
-
Crap. I was just joking and yet utility bills are listed. smh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Nah it’s always been PA residents only.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
The residency requirement was at least initially aimed at Los Altos Hills and Portola Valley, rather than keeping out any particular socioeconomic class.https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2013/06/30/debate-of-foothills-park-residency-requirement-continues …
-
Having gone there on field trips, the 1,000 visitor/day limit makes a lot of sense to keep it wild (not to mention Page Mill Road isn't built for Arastradero Park-level traffic). Limiting it to PA residents, when the bump rate is so low, needs to change though.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.