I appreciate surge in urbanist journalism, and, IMO, good deal of it is very good. I'm, however, less taken w/some that rails against something, sometimes name-dropping some urban/political theory, but w/weak (or no) evidence to support what are effectively empirical arguments.
also, what'd you think of the Georgia State piece in the NYTimes today?
-
-
Was great. Happy to see recognition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.