It’s not a good look for @sfchronicle to try to defend their journalistic ethics and objectivity by comparing (candidate they oppose) @JaneKim to Donald Trump.
-
-
She made a substantive response to and critique of specific communications from a reporter. There's a difference between that and non-substantively dismissing every outlet / report you don't like with an epithet like "fake news."
-
Whatever you think of the original questions, or the responses, enduring substantive critique is part of the journalist's job description. When we ask someone questions on the record, our questions are part of the record too.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Comparing people you don’t like to Trump is the new comparing people you don’t like to Nazis. Lazy and inaccurate ways to shortcut meaningful debate. And beneath your intelligence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sophistry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didn't realize that mistaking two Korean women with the same name counts as a pointed question. Way to set the bar high for journalistic integrity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.