Like how she ran basically immediately and wasn't a civil rights attorney for very long. Or how her personal economic security comes from luxury condos in NYC (possibly built on demolished SROs), and then she decries condo creation in SF.
No, I said that a less hypocritical approach would be to say that condos were important for her family's upward mobility in New York City and to support more of them, especially in exclusionary communities.
-
-
This is what you said. You said her personal economic security comes from her Dad’s real estate possession. Also, fyi, Jane supports housing!pic.twitter.com/budQx20L0q
-
Are you a real person? There is no record of you online.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.