"SB 827 only promoted the kind of housing we DON'T need- luxury towers that gentrify, further inflate real estate prices, and undermine our power to negotiate community benefits like affordable housing and funding for transit." -@TenantsUnionSF #SB827 https://www.facebook.com/AdamKimSF/posts/209513919645468 …
A) it did not override local inclusionary regulations. So whatever % was in place that a city already approved, that would apply to any 827 project. And B) is a city did not have an inclusionary requirement, 827 imposed one — which would’ve been the largest scale inclusionary
-
-
Program in the state’s history of it had passed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.