They aren't outnumbered. They were the ones who won the day yesterday-- the Beverly Hills mayor, the Twitter trolls from Marin, etc. They will destroy any serious plan for density, whether public or private. You're carrying water for them.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @cat_guy_steve @dillonliam
If rich foreign investors wanted to buy a house in CA, they already would have. They are rich. Stop with that bullshit, it is dumb. New housing development would have helped middle class families the most. Not low income renters. Low income renters need social housing.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not all of CA is SF or Silicone valley, but it is all overpriced because rich home owners wont allow new homes to be built. If the rich wanted condos, they could already buy them. This debate is not about them. If you could at least stop spreading that lie, it would be progress.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What part of the bill’s text that said that parcels with rent or price controlled housing on them were not applicable for this program did you not actually read?
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Do you really think that SF would pass a specific program to explicitly allow destruction of rent controlled units?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
45% of the housing stock is rent controlled. I just don’t see any kind of way that a voting bloc of that size gets overruled into explicit mass destruction of rent controlled units. Scott basically re-imposed SF’s norms on the rest of the state in 827.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.