Why is mayoral candidate @JaneKim literally lying in this video about @Scott_Wiener's bill to protect single-family homes, which have appreciated by $300,000 in the last year alone in SF? Read @Scott_Wiener's amendments here: https://medium.com/@Scott_Wiener/sb-827-amendments-affordability-transit-lines-height-ellis-act-protections-more-fae09ee3f897 …https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pD2Dby4GOPg&feature=youtu.be&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=http%3A%2F%2Fd31hzlhk6di2h5.cloudfront.net%2F20180416%2F60%2Fc5%2F6e%2F07%2F0f8ce856ffaea5e2a758ac84_1240x698.jpg&utm_campaign=060517 …
-
-
Sure, but the bill would expand the ability for developers to build market-rate condos throughout most of the city. She's not lying, she's just interpreting the effect differently than you are, no?
-
this doesn't pave the way for "high rises." Four to five stories is not a high rise. And there is not "unlimited" luxury condo construction. I don't think those could be argued as true.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, SB 827 adds literally 5 extra feet of height in the Richmond, one of the neighborhoods she cites. That's not exactly "unlimited luxury condo towers".
-
Wait I misspoke. The Richmond has no rail so it literally gets NO height changes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.