How effective would the new law be in facilitating development? That's a hard causal question to tackle in retrospect, let alone ahead of time.
-
-
Replying to @issiromem @rihallix and
How much housing needs to be built to dampen housing price appreciation to a certain level is also a hard question. The only study I know that relates to it is the LAO study from a couple years ago, but it's very rough.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Are you a supporter of
#sb827?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I would rather see local jurisdictions' ability to stand in the way of development curbed more generally and w/out creating a disincentive to stand in the way of transit, too, but I'll take SB827 over inaction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I would like to see more small scale dispersed infill projects approved - but every situation is unique to the locality.
#sb827 is an extreme over-reach serving an agenda. I'll take continued slow, planned growth over agenda driven extreme solutions with unintended consequences.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
What is “small scale”? SB 827 isn’t mega rises. It’s “missing middle” housing which, given the land costs, is the cheapest per unit to build RN
4 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @rihallix and
This thread tells you everything you need to know about housing policy in the Bay Area ... fwiw majorities across the Bay Area want to see more building in their neighborhood so we do have democracy, environmental protection AND equity on our side.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mdweinberg @kimmaicutler and
We’re sure this isn’t a parody account?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @issiromem @kimmaicutler and
Because this guy making these arguments, it’s a little, well ... rich
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.