I can’t believe this tweet isn’t going viral. Do people not really care that Facebook may have systematically charged the Clinton campaign an order of magnitude or two more than it was charging Trump to reach American voters? (Which is not allowed in other mediums by law.)https://twitter.com/parscale/status/967516077956755457 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
When you say systematically, people will read that as "intentionally" - obviously this is not what happened
6 replies 5 retweets 88 likes -
Replying to @JeffreyTWebb
Yeah I just realized that. Normally my audience is a lot of tech people so they understand dynamic ad pricing. But this one seems to tipped over into a more mainstream audience.
22 replies 3 retweets 117 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @JeffreyTWebb
I’d like to read about this. Could you steer me towards reliable article? Thanks.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrippinPippin12 @kimmaicutler
Trying :) It's pretty dry stuff, so not exactly publisher-nip. If no one will take it, I'll type it up on Medium and send it your way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @TrippinPippin12 @kimmaicutler
Here ya go!https://medium.com/@JeffreyTWebb/no-facebook-didnt-give-the-trump-campaign-discounts-dbb2d74e3915 …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think the explanations in these piece make sense but there's not enough in there explaining *why* we should be concerned about public discourse? Is this neutral? Good? Bad?
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @TrippinPippin12
Hmmm the last section? Yeah I mean I could amend, but the basics are that quality score exacerbates filter bubbles and inflammatory rhetoric. If that didn't come through I'll try to fix
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.