I can’t believe this tweet isn’t going viral. Do people not really care that Facebook may have systematically charged the Clinton campaign an order of magnitude or two more than it was charging Trump to reach American voters? (Which is not allowed in other mediums by law.)https://twitter.com/parscale/status/967516077956755457 …
-
-
Ok, but I don’t think extreme/centrist is structurally baked into the pricing. If in the next election, everyone decides extremist ads are best, the targeting will get bidded up higher than centrist ads. There are more factors here than AGM’s simplified description made it sound.
-
What kinds of transparency requirements do you think there should be around political advertising on online platforms with ultra-dominant market power?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And shows "bias" in a free democratic process for one over another. Unless public trickery and personal slander along with supported false narratives are considered part of the "free democratic process".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again, what was the cause. Right now this conversation seems to be about the effect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree. Hillary should not be allowed to say she didnt break the law by deleting her emails .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.