I would support excluding commercial property from prop 13 @kimmaicutler (38m). Still needed for residential to preserve home affordability for seniors. Many were forced out before prop 13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7G8gmzK6bE …
There is nothing that sensible about the way the current Bay Area is planned with 20+ separate transit agencies and people mega-commuting from central CA because we have low density housing by billions of dollars of public transit infrastructure.
-
-
And given that the Bay Area’s real estate values generally double every economic upcycle given that the regions builds very little relative to population growth, you are effectively advocating for displacement, overcrowding and megacommuting. You are advocating for drowning.
-
You are not displaced. Get that out of your head. You're a VC and dodge taxes the rest of us pay
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Back to the same old fallacy: 105' buildings literally everywhere, enriching developers but harming communities are the solution
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.