50+ units usually *doesn’t* mean high-rise
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Maybe because automobile-dependent living requires developers to build this way. Devs. can can make a profit building a tower because the costs are spread over many units; Dev. can profit on SFH b/c the per-unit cost is low, but mid-rise has too few units and too much land cost
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's like insanity in action and completely in strange refutation of free-markets and a desperate alliance and demand for socialism, while still providing the wealth generation needed to sustain free-market idealogues. I've always marveled at the oddity of American cities too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apparently Peskin & Lee (according to post on NextDoor-SF) want to shrink 6th from Mkt to 280 down to 2 lanes, expand sidewalks, and add bike-paths -- somehow don't see this working out well (think Manhattan Port Authority bus ramps during morning commute instead w/ TechCoBusses)
-
Correction: meant Peskin & Kim -- (still have Lee on the brain, hopefully it will pass soon)..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I checked out of curiosity. Seattle MSA really rocked midsize in 1980-2000, but now is really heavy on SFHs. Here is Bay Area for comparison.pic.twitter.com/QBpHrG2RDV
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.