Yes, should have been more clear. As someone who looks at this from a regional/state/natl/private and public perspective I don’t think of spending just as the City/County budget.
No, I do not. At the end of the day, we have 1600-1700 shelter beds for 7,000 people. Half the budget is spent on another 6,000 permanent supportive housing units, for which the city is trying to increase the re-housing rate so there's more turnover/exits.
-
-
What is your preferred way to raise the 100s of millions in additional city expenditures you’re proposing?
-
Don't know. Just being honest that given the way that broader CA state & federal systems treat housing/real estate, US cities are effectively running in place. SF *not* experiencing a 40% increase in PIT counts like Alameda Co. is not bad.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is your preferred solution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.