You’d think it was a refugee camp, or someplace in a deep recession, or that lost a war.
-
-
We’re talking about different ways of thinking about what we’re spending.
-
If this is the logic that you're using, then the budget should really be $120M instead of $240M, because the part that is spent on permanent supportive housing is really "low-income affordable housing" not "homelessness"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.