There are ~30,000 vacant homes in San Francisco. Why emphasis on building skyscrapers that'd add far fewer units than policies addressing vacant properties as solution to affordability crisis? Do u think both issues should be addressed? Genuinely curious. http://www.antievictionmappingproject.net/vacancy.html
I can’t tell from the documents. If it’s low-income Housing, they can rely on federal low-income tax credits. If it’s middle income, the city has to subsidize it itself. http://sfmohcd.org/sites/default/files/Scoping%20Report_20171201_Final.pdf …