There are ~30,000 vacant homes in San Francisco. Why emphasis on building skyscrapers that'd add far fewer units than policies addressing vacant properties as solution to affordability crisis? Do u think both issues should be addressed? Genuinely curious. http://www.antievictionmappingproject.net/vacancy.html
-
-
There definitely are some vacant buildings thoughhttps://missionlocal.org/2017/06/one-vacant-block-in-sfs-mission-reaches-back-into-another-era/ …
-
Here's one in NOPA, less than 1/2 mile from the project site:pic.twitter.com/ei3nyCHF2T
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks! Is it known what rents would be, i.e what "affordable housing" in this building would mean? I've never in my life been able to afford "affordable housing" rents in new construction condos in NYC, SF, or elsewhere, so tend to be a bit suspicious, but maybe unnecessarily so
-
I can’t tell from the documents. If it’s low-income Housing, they can rely on federal low-income tax credits. If it’s middle income, the city has to subsidize it itself. http://sfmohcd.org/sites/default/files/Scoping%20Report_20171201_Final.pdf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.