I’d quite like her to engage with my argument instead of speechifying on tangents. As it is, unproductive
-
-
-
Her argument as I understand it is about choice architecture — what FB chooses to optimize around overall & its unforeseen consequences
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
People will happily share articles with inflammatory headlines to their friends and fam w/out even clicking on them, let alone reading them.
-
That one is easy to correct. Elevate posts where they’ve actually spent time on the linked URL.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"People actually want stuff that is bad for them" seems like it's an impossible proposition for commentators to accept.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where's that 280 characters
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then you should read the post
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I point out that she’s drawing a false distinction that doesn’t alter my point in any way. With a colloquialism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every time dude gets into it on twitter, I struggle with the idea that he has so much money & influence. This is performance art, right?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
!
