It's almost like we are already aware that legislative action requires frequent and sustained pressure over long timescales or something
-
-
Did you not read the rest of what I wrote? What Chiu submitted was not actually passable and he knew it. It was one sentence long.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
If it wasn't passable what was the point of it? I assume to gauge support from other legislators and constituents, to put focus on the issue
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
To win points with tenant base. But it was never passable. Draft something more passable & literally give it to them while they’re on recess
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @tbreisacher and
Do you think repealing Costa Hawkins is a good idea or a bad idea?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @post_alex @tbreisacher and
I think reforming it and Proposition 13 are important components in addressing the statewide housing crisis.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @tbreisacher and
Reform, not outright repeal? What parts do you think should stay in some form?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @post_alex @tbreisacher and
a straight repeal of either Costa-Hawkins or Prop. 13 would never pass in this state. So you would have to think about the parts that you
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @post_alex and
*do* want to change that protect the constituencies that you want to protect that would also have some feasibility in passing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @post_alex and
So, for example, I can imagine a constituency you'd want to protect is renters in REO-to-rental single-family rentals, post-foreclosure...
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
But how would you do that without triggering the all the single-family homeowners throughout the state into opposition?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.