This @tylercowen piece has zero mentions of race, racialized housing policy, “white flight” or exclusionary zoning in shaping these outcomeshttps://twitter.com/tylercowen/status/918151245331877888 …
-
-
-
Replying to @tylercowen
I just did. I don’t see it. Exclusionary policy, yes. But not how racialized federal housing policy made urban real estate undervalued.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
For a start, you are changing your claim as to what is not in there.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tylercowen
Race, racialized housing policy and “white flight” are definitely not in there. I might give you exclusionary zoning bc you mentioned NIMBYs
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @tylercowen
We might discuss say how racialized housing policy in the postwar period led to property value differentials between urban and suburban real
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @kimmaicutler @tylercowen
estate, and that those differentials necessitate different kinds of business models to be self-sustaining.
1:06 PM - 11 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.