We're on it! ;-)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not new! Discussion of smart growth in the 90's was minimally different from this. Or see Christopher Alexander https://www.patternlanguage.com/bookstore/pattern-language.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But going to planning meetings and talking to city councils is boring :).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally agree with the caveat that Sacramento must get involved at some point because the real issue is not housing but location of jobs..1/
-
,archaic infrastructure and transportation. Density is not the solution of the future; it kills quality of life. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. Hope it happens. I am on team "cities have capacity limits not be exceeded" (see my rants on Stockholm and demands by tech companies).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lived on 63rd and Lexington for a bit in 80s. I love New York but it could be a truly great city if limits were recognized; "No Vacancy".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"change infrastructure finance" is colorful language for "raise taxes"
-
It's less about quantity than quality. The right kinds of taxes cause less inefficiency and deadweight loss.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can't be walkable if not dense. A dense suburb is no longer a suburb. How does that work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.