-
-
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
So because building affordable housing is hard and expensive we shouldn't do it or? What's your point?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrandonHarami
Bc he knows after 40 years of being in this state, that our budget is very volatile because it is so dependent on PIT and cap gains revenue
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Even though tens of thousands of people have been pushed out onto the streets by the free market and displacement caused by
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonHarami
It's not a free market and it never was and it never will be that. People are being displaced because the population is growing and affluent
7 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
You're right. And SB35 is allowing these areas to remain undeveloped. And this areas aren't the lower income areas that are being displaced
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonHarami @kimmaicutler
Do you understand that SB35 will apply state-wide? Palo Alto, Marin, Walnut Creek, Piedmont...
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @TribTowerViews @kimmaicutler
Since SB35 doest lift their RHNA housing, these places would not absorb the intended housing. Poorer greenfield exurbs will!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
they're at best getting to like 50% of rhna. If we can get closer, it's still a win.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.