RHNA is and has been a deeply flawed method for estimating housing demand for decades.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @WatsonLadd and
Aside from RHNA the numbers show we're primarily building for the rich. Nobody I know believes that's right (except the far right)
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sf4sfsite @WatsonLadd and
Then why don't you help pay for affordable housing, maybe through higher property taxes or giving up some cap gains at sale?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @WatsonLadd and
Much prefer immediate and locally controlled SF progressive income tax
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sf4sfsite @WatsonLadd and
because you don't want to share your windfall.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @WatsonLadd and
My conscience is clear. Won't share details but I've helped/shared plenty on my retirement income.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sf4sfsite @WatsonLadd and
Your charity is not a structural solution to affordable housing. What we need are structural and systemwide changes.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @WatsonLadd and
Late stage capitalism as its evolving is the structural problem (from someone who used to be pretty financially conservative)
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sf4sfsite @WatsonLadd and
From the 1940s-1970s, California housing did not appreciate much above the pace of inflation, incomes & then it started outpacing in the 70s
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @sf4sfsite and
The state ran out of undeveloped flatlands on the coast, the property owners downzoned and then cut their taxes
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
If you owned anywhere else in the country, your house would be about $200K. But it's probably in the millions.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.