Yup… I really like @Pinboard but he is missing the facts here.
-
-
Replying to @jlax @kimmaicutler
I’m calling for reforms in these areas, and structural funding of local government in CA. Not sure why the handclaps
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Sorry I'm soooooooooooo tired of people not understanding the tax structure of the state. There's land wealth, corporate wealth, equity....
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @jlax
is there a nice online rant somewhere that goes into this? I think it’s a fascinating topic, understand your frustration
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Not really because I also don't fully understand it. :-) but that SCO report from Betty Yee has some perspective (at least for CA)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is not even to mention intl corporate tax reform in which multiple govts claim a share of this tech co revenue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @Pinboard
I think this is the point. The complexity of the issue prevents it from being a single dimension.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
In San Jose's specific case, it's because it's the bedroom community to the Northern Santa Clara County citieshttp://www.spur.org/publications/spur-report/2016-05-12/back-black …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It has to house hundreds of thousands of workers & provide police, fire, schools w/out a stable tax revenue base while the county's
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Northern cities have the corporate HQs, hoard the local tax revenue from AAPL, Google, FB but don't have to provide services to workers
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
There's no regional tax sharing nor any incentive for the northern SC county cities to share that revenue w SJ.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.