Me, smart leftist: No housing unless 50% inclusionary. You, dumb neolib: what about massive public housing? Me: lol never gonna happen
-
-
Replying to @TribTowerViews
Public/private partnerships to build high rates of aff housing in market projects is doable (works for dorms and BART).
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @eean @TribTowerViews
But maybe that gives up the game that IZ is hella neoliberal
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @eean @TribTowerViews
Once you've accepted the neoliberal framework of IZ then it should be left to function as smoothly as possible.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
But if don't want to hide the state's hand in providing social services then push policies towards that end..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RevClown @TribTowerViews
There's a strange vein of thinking among leftists where they'd rather make demands of capitalists instead of tax-and-spend
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I dunno if it's like anti-government anarchist thinking or just internalized Howard Jarvis thinking amongst Bay Area leftists
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eean @TribTowerViews
The latter IMO. The last 40 years have been about fashioning ever more sophisticated prop 13 workarounds.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
one recently upheld by the Supreme Court! http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/06/02/at-u-s-supreme-court-level-san-ramon-wins-tax-district-case/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.