It works reasonably well in Vienna, Singapore and Hong Kong but is not something in near-term reality here nor is something that SF has
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Selling out the city to property developers is not the solution either. We can't cut corners in order to solve this crisis.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BrandonHarami @kimmaicutler
Funny @biblerocket, remember "Local Politics'" lovely post calling progs "full of s**t" for not supporting public housing? Stay classy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @uhshanti
don't recall us asking the city to sell its own public land to developers. Please keep protecting property owners' wealth w scarce housing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Please keep pretending an Econ 101 graph is the answer to a global crisis of commodification.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @uhshanti
Please keep responding with alternatives that have no basis in reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I'm amazed by the compulsive refusal to take critics on the left seriously yet claim the mantle of housing equity, "fighting the power"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @uhshanti @kimmaicutler
When progressives suggest market intervention that helps folks now, you say it's bad for the market. You say they're fakes or "brainwashed".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @uhshanti
There's tons of market intervention. It just generally helps pre-existing property owners (who tend to be upper middle class.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @uhshanti
MID, Prop. 13, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages backed by $6T in securitization from the GSEs, local zoning restrictions. All govt intervention
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yep. No response to the points above. OK.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.