Some of the most intense opposition is against 100% affordable housing. 209 units, Queens http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20160919/REAL_ESTATE/160919868/all-affordable-queens-apartment-complex-canceled-in-face-of-local-opposition …https://twitter.com/sandypsj/status/863759646544343040 …
-
-
Replying to @rolandlisf
94 units, Missionhttp://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2017/02/14/affordable-senior-housing-mission-nimby.html …
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rolandlisf
150 units, Forest Hill http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/In-a-wealthy-SF-neighborhood-residents-fight-10617213.php …
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @rolandlisf
60 senior units, Palo Alto, lost at ballot http://www.mercurynews.com/2013/11/05/voters-reject-affordable-senior-housing-project-in-palo-alto/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rolandlisf
22 veteran homes, San Diego http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/communities/north-county/sd-no-poway-habitat-20161115-story.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rolandlisf
32 units, Montana http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/county/county-commission-rejects-big-sky-affordable-housing-project/article_5cf543f4-beff-5885-a6f8-9a168fa1cddf.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rolandlisf1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.