That's what regional planning with teeth is needed for. And public transit that goes to job centers.
-
-
-
and the regional planning can balance locations of job centers (ie BART transbay should be full in both directions morning and evening)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That has no impact on regional traffic or eviction pressures in larger cities........right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't this mostly on NIMBYs who bought into the market in the 70s/80s and don't want to "lose" money due to new property expansion?
-
Yes. People actively protest new construction in my area. All of them are (of course) home owners and landlords.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
waiting for an apartment on a cruise ship
perma-docked on the bay somewhere
in Redwood Shores or SF - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
All it would take is a single brave VC to fund condos & offices on trains (federally zoned) to bypass local zoning:http://medium.com/@CeoNunneley/portfolio-first-downs-6bbd34b57830 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What I don't get is why NIMBYs think apartment construction will lower property values. If anything upzoning should make land more valuable
-
They don't want money. Want defense of a lifestyle.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.