-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why am I obligated to tell you that? I'm a beneficiary of MID but I don't think it's good structural policy long-term, especially when I
-
see and work with lots of people experiencing homelessness in the Bay Area, and constantly see groups fighting over scraps of funding for
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"In more restrictive places an adverse effect exists."pic.twitter.com/DiCtTX8ZmP
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Happy to pay taxes. But what you're suggesting is not a structural solution to the regressiveness of US housing policy
-
& the way it perpetuates the racial wealth gap. Come on, think about why those disinvested communities are in the Bronx in the 1st place
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The deduction doesn't even predominantly go to the middle class. The bulk of it goes toward the upper middle class.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In supply restricted markets, the deduction is priced into and then neutralized by higher housing costs to begin with.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.