Omg, touching the
's nest! https://twitter.com/graue/status/859961756629606400 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@graue@yimbyyy as a SF SFH owner I think there *is* middle ground;I would've approved forest hill senior center, not Rezoning2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tolles @kimmaicutler and
Restrictive zoning, by design, protects wealthy individuals from the greater purchasing power of a collection of poor people.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @CAveryLittle @tolles and
Upzoning in your neighborhood allows you to keep your home while also allowing new neighbors to move in who can't afford what you can.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CAveryLittle @tolles and
What about rezoning do you not support? The new neighbors? The new affordable housing? The downward pressure on housing prices?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @CAveryLittle @kimmaicutler and
I think the easiest way to increase density around my neighborhood is uplevel existing multiunit
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tolles @kimmaicutler and
So you want to displace existing renters in order to protect the lifestyle of wealthy single family homeowners? I wish I was shocked.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CAveryLittle @tolles and
Please don't pick this fight that way.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
thank you. I'll own up to being pro owner & honest about my interests. But in SF, i think I'm reasonable
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tolles
The issue with your position is that existing non SFH tend to be poorer and more diverse. So you're effectively placing the burden away from
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
More affluent, less diverse neighborhoods. It's like mandating that everyone in your neighborhood has to only buy SUVs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.