I should be clear that this isn't an argument for no income tax or reducing the progressivity of CA tax base, but just saying that income
-
-
-
tax (& its volatility) won't make up for a deeply distortionary land use, property tax system in CA.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do you have a link to that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks, do you have a link to the explanation?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in CA, each property can go up by more than 2% per year based on whatever it was purchased at. So adjacent homes can have wildly diff rates.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can you have two identically valued houses next to each other w/ one paying a 1970s rate & the other paying a 2017 rate?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's pretty amazing how much stuff is invented and build in Bay Area. Except damn housing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Seattle Metro vs SF/Bay though? I don't know Seattle but I have a feeling adorable suburbs are far more accessible.
-
http://seattle.curbed.com/2014/10/13/10036456/mapping-the-average-commute-from-anywhere-in-the-seattle-area … That looks like SHORT commutes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.