A core difference between @SFHAC and @SF_CCHO: is market rate housing enough of a public benefit by itself? Personally, I say yes.https://twitter.com/sf_ccho/status/850498542607126529 …
-
-
Dennis. Peter. In a functioning state, most cities would see net in-migration of taxpayers as good.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
yall know very well displacement is incentivized by broken state tax policy.
@kimmaicutler has...1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MetroObserver @coreysmith_17 and
... written about this endlessly but you still act like piecemeal fees can help.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Piecemeal fees are a way of protecting the scarcity that enables existing housing to be a great store of wealth while feeling "progressive"
1 reply 5 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @MetroObserver and
Wealth isn't Nimby primary focus! It's our different view of what is livable vs the density crowd.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sf4sfsite @kimmaicutler and
Yimby outlook is largerly environmental too. Every home not built in urban core is sprawled out, often to CA Central Valley.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @coreysmith_17 @sf4sfsite and
The people who will live in that sprawl will be the working classes who currently live in the close in neighborhoods
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RevClown @coreysmith_17 and
And wealthier people who don't want to live in a little box in an overcrowded city.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Your Twitter handle would make more sense if it were @SF4Ohlone
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.