it's not tired because it's true. http://cityobservatory.org/housing-cant-be-a-good-investment-and-affordable/ …http://cityobservatory.org/a-1-6-billion-proposal/ …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
the piece has a completely different point than in the prior thread. I & lots of progressives support a windfall profits tax.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natogreen
to do that, property owners have to understand that they are also complicit & pt of the problem. Which they don't understand
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
perhaps. I'm just saying a lot of progressives support this, which is quite different from your argument about prog politics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natogreen
why are we having an entirely theatrical conversation about inclusionary at 1700 units/yr versus 1500 units/yr, both of which are
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @natogreen
less than 20-yr historical norms and just serve to enrich whoever owned property or land first here?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
never mind. It's fine. You don't want to engage the question on Twitter. Serves me for reading the article.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natogreen
im asking you legitimate questions and you have no answers.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @natogreen
land values go up. That's America. Manifests in both luxury flips and/or new condos. Without the latter, it's just the former.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
yes. That's why progressives pushed the speculator tax in 2014, which enraged moderate homeowners.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
that was a tax on price not on gains.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.