Better to promote1-fam-to-apt upzoning than to trash anti-displacement work.
why are we having an entirely theatrical conversation about inclusionary at 1700 units/yr versus 1500 units/yr, both of which are
-
-
less than 20-yr historical norms and just serve to enrich whoever owned property or land first here?
-
never mind. It's fine. You don't want to engage the question on Twitter. Serves me for reading the article.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.