we'd love to do that except the *same* people oppose upcoming 1-fam neighborhoods
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @MBridegam and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @MBridegam and
and when YIMBYs ask for alliances in promoting more housing in Brisbane, Mission
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @MBridegam and
anti-displacement balks and is nowhere to be seen.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
it's weird how some people are incapable of discussing sf politics without returning to this same tired argument. Every time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @natogreen
it's not tired because it's true. http://cityobservatory.org/housing-cant-be-a-good-investment-and-affordable/ …http://cityobservatory.org/a-1-6-billion-proposal/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
the piece has a completely different point than in the prior thread. I & lots of progressives support a windfall profits tax.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natogreen
to do that, property owners have to understand that they are also complicit & pt of the problem. Which they don't understand
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
perhaps. I'm just saying a lot of progressives support this, which is quite different from your argument about prog politics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natogreen
why is the west side untouchable? Why are Sandra lee fewer and Calvin welch complicit in this?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
why, for all of the conversations we have about displacement and inequality in Eastern neighborhoods, other ares are untouchable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.