This is appalling. And @mayoredlee and the Supes should be ashamed. As with the tech companies who drive up cost of living.https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/845060368888033280 …
-
-
Replying to @ClaraJeffery @mayoredlee
respectfully I think the blame lies fully on the city for not building enough housing to support population growth
3 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @fulligin @ClaraJeffery
it's way more complicated than that. See Serrano v. Priest plus Prop. 13 plus "California rule" for pensions
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @ClaraJeffery
interesting can you elaborate more? my comment was mostly about SF's low density choking out supply for teachers
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fulligin @ClaraJeffery
at this point w/ land costs, I think it's unrealistic to assume market based production for teachers. SF should have
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
built that teacher housing 17 years ago. And then some.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
but these are choices Californian voters made. They chose to cut taxes on real estate, making them more attractive
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
as investments (thereby boosting their value) while deliberately underfunding public K-12 education.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
CA used to be a top 5 state in per student spending in the 1960s then it fell into the bottom 10 a generation later
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @ClaraJeffery
ah, I think you are saying more blame lies with past CA-wide decision-making. Fair enough, hard to disagree!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.