@kimmaicutler DR unanimous result = 1 more affordable, redesign project to match Mission St, redesign to fix ADA & lightwell probs.
-
-
This article pretty clearly lays out the positive outcome for Mission working-class. https://missionlocal.org/2017/02/development-delayed-as-sf-commission-wants-less-aggressive-design/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @papadooloo @kimmaicutler
what are you talking about re: mission working class? What the DR did is change the way the building looks
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Building was an advertisement for gentrification. Watch what Commissioners said about it. DR was needed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Mission is already gentrified. It's done. It's over. Look at the prices. https://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/San-Francisco-CA/20330_rid/6m_days/1600-_size/globalrelevanceex_sort/37.768391,-122.400033,37.751495,-122.438228_rect/14_zm/ …pic.twitter.com/Qx0OmDHEXn
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Mission St still home to thousands of working-class families and the Mom n Pops they shop at.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
new protected housing is largely financed through inclusionary from MR. Without MR, the upward $ pressure on
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @papadooloo and
existing units becomes more extreme. & other working-class communities elsewhere feels the impact more.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
macro impacts spread through whole region in very very tiny increments locally
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Right - Yimbys focus on macro while we see the micro-neighborhood impacts and cultural destruction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
... which is the result of the macro.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.