Can @realDonaldTrump actually withhold $1 billion a year out of San Francisco's $9.6B budget?https://twitter.com/CALmatters/status/829486984041111553 …
-
-
-
Replying to @nmoryl @kimmaicutler
somewhat longer: fed gov't can't compel local gov'ts directly, and can't do indirectly what it's banned from doing directly
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nmoryl @kimmaicutler
probably a 10th amendment violation. See: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/12/28/states-dont-have-to-comply-the-anti-comandeering-doctrine/ … especially Independent Business vs Sebelius (2012 case)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
omg
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
disagree?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nmoryl @kimmaicutler
even worse, this is literally the subject of my Harvard Law School thesis.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
what was your argument?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @nmoryl
I devised a united conceptual approach to unconstitutional conditions precedent that was deemed inconsistent.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
what does that mean in non-legalese?
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @rabois
well, uncons cond doctrine is basically the govt can't condition receipt of benefit on waiver of constitutional rights
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nmoryl @kimmaicutler
yes, but not sure a sanctuary city is sacrificing a constitutional right.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.