Of course you agree -- venture capitalists and developers had better stick together! Good luck to you.
-
-
Replying to @supermarke @SFyimby
I think we're trying to say that everything is F--ked unless you add more capacity and invest in public infrastructure
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
ironically condos in the most posh buildings are cheaper than freestanding homes in SF (the real luxury) these days
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
your boss is part of the petite landed gentry btw.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
your candidates build nothing, watch their assets appreciate and then make new people indirectly pay for a token amt of
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
BMR that assuages their guilty liberal consciences & then complains when said policies make housing even more expensive
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
"complains" or "enjoys"?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I like that the theory of homeowners voting their pocketbook is a "Trumpian conspiracy" according to
@supermarke1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
lol. Under CA state tax law, someone is always going to be making $$$$ on land and property.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I do think the antihousing voters are motivated by fear of change. asset appreciation only icing.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
agreed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.